[CSC 335] A Target...
Andrew J. Pounds
pounds_aj at mercer.edu
Fri Dec 6 07:28:37 EST 2013
Good morning. I know you all are probably working on your NMR project
and need some idea if you are in the ballpark with your answers. Since a
big part of this exercise is you working through your data and trying to
verify if you are producing correct results, I am not going to, as I did
last time, provide you with a complete output file. The tendency when I
do things like that is for students to try and "hit" my results exactly.
I was fine with this in years past when everyone was using the same
language (Fortran), same numerical libraries (LAPACK), and following the
exact same method to a solution. As the class has grown and I have
allowed more diversity in programming choices, it is a bit optimistic to
think that you will "hit" my target exactly.
Don't be misled -- I am still looking for something close -- but hitting
my results to machine precision is not going to happen with the variety
of programming options we have in play on this project. Nonetheless,
here is some information that might help you.
In the project document I told you to set your automatic baseline
adjustment so that you were integrating 85% of the total area assuming
that the minimum of your filtered dataset was set to zero. With the two
datasets that are out there now you will most likely find that this 85%
value results in you getting only one peak. That's not a problem, but
you should set that value somewhere in your program that is OBVIOUS and
easy to change for testing purposes. When I grade your programs I will
want to do play with this value in your code.
When I reset the integrated area percentage to 25% in my code, and then
ran the code on the smaller set of testdata with default DFT filtering,
the baseline was determined to be around 3650 and 4 peaks were
detected. Two of the peaks were small representing roughly 5% of the
total area integrated.
Look forward to seeing you all in class today (with the exception of
Levi who will not be with us today).
--
Andrew J. Pounds, Ph.D. (pounds_aj at mercer.edu)
Professor of Chemistry and Computer Science
Mercer University, Macon, GA 31207 (478) 301-5627
http://faculty.mercer.edu/pounds_aj
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://theochem.mercer.edu/pipermail/csc335/attachments/20131206/054d5382/attachment.html>
More information about the csc335
mailing list