[CSC 435] Dusty Improvements

[Andrew J. Pounds]

On 2/3/22 10:15, Jackson H. Paul wrote:
> Hi Dr. Pounds,
>
> Thank you for your help, dusty in C gives me the same result!
>
> I was wondering what the format is for documenting the code 
> improvements. So, we graph all 10 changes against the original, and 
> then graph all 5 improvements against the original?
>
That's probably the easiest thing to do -- but since each different 
language is required to have a minimum of two improvements, you could 
have a situation where you overall improvement graph for fortran, for 
instance, only had two improvements and your C version had three 
improvements.


Does that make sense?

>
>
> Thank you,
>
> *Jackson Paul*
> Mercer University
> (he/him/his)
>

-- 
*/Andrew J. Pounds, Ph.D./*
/Professor of Chemistry and Computer Science/
/Director of the Computational Science Program/
/Mercer University, Macon, GA 31207 (478) 301-5627/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://theochem.mercer.edu/pipermail/csc435/attachments/20220203/82adf749/attachment.html>