[CHM 112] Burdge
Andrew J. Pounds
pounds_aj at mercer.edu
Mon Jul 22 03:15:19 EDT 2013
From step 1 the hydronium ion concentration was 0.0397. In the second
and third equilibrations I would calculate x values that had to be
ADDED to 0.0397 to get the total hydronium ion concentration. In step
two that value was 0.0000000625. In the third step it would have been
even smaller based on the relative size of Ka3. Since both of these are
insignificant compared to 0.0397, I just based the pH off of the 0.0397.
You cannot always assume that the other steps are insignificant but you
can assume that if the second step is insignificant then the third step
is insignificant too.
On 07/21/13 21:01, Mary Caroline Logan wrote:
> For question number 16.84: after you calculate the concentrations of
> the second reaction, why did you stop? Is it a general rule that if x
> is insignificant in comparison to the x of the previous reaction, then
> you stop? I'm confused. I continued on and calculated the third x the
> same way I had before with the Ka3, and I ended up with a ph of 7.2,
> which seemed way too high.
>
> Caroline Logan
>
--
Andrew J. Pounds, Ph.D. (pounds_aj at mercer.edu)
Professor of Chemistry and Computer Science
Mercer University, Macon, GA 31207 (478) 301-5627
http://faculty.mercer.edu/pounds_aj
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://theochem.mercer.edu/pipermail/chm112/attachments/20130722/e21efbb4/attachment.html>
More information about the chm112
mailing list